Tensions between physis and nómos in Aristotle's theory of the pólis
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

Naturalism
politics
nature
law

How to Cite

Tensions between physis and nómos in Aristotle’s theory of the pólis. (2018). Revista Jurídica Digital UANDES, 1(2), 92-108. https://doi.org/10.24822/rjduandes.0102.6

Abstract

The concept of nature has been recognized as key to understanding the foundations of 13th century texts on political theory that started to be composed thanks to the Recovery of Aristotle's Politics. Historiography forged the notion of "political naturalism" in order to characterize those political theories which appeal to nature to explain the origin of the political order and the relationships among men, in opposition to those explanations invoking a convention, agreement or pact. In line with this understanding of "naturalism," an exclusionary -and therefore unyielding- opposition has been sought out in Aristotle in terms of nature and law. In this study, we will analyze the concept of nature as it operates in some of the most important "naturalist" theses, and we intend to demonstrate that, far from being explanatory, the physis/nómos opposition in the scope of human affairs complicates the means by which nature is understood in the theory of the pólis.
PDF (Spanish)

References

Álvarez, L.M. (2012). “Una visión sofística del pacto social. Las palabras y las apariencias como sostenes del acuerdo”, en La palabra y la ciudad. Retórica y política en la Grecia Antigua. Livov, G. y Spangenberg P. (eds.) Buenos Aires: La bestia equilátera.

Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition, USA: University of Chicago Press.

Aubenque, P. (1962). Le problème de l´être chez Aristote. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Berti, E. (1997). “Il pensiero politico di Aristotele”, Roma: Editori Laterza.

Bien, G. (1973). Die Grundlegung der politishen Philosophie bei Aristoteles, Freiburg-München: Alber.

Black, A. (1996). El pensamiento político en Europa, 1250-1450. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boeri, M. (Trad. e introd). (1993), “Apéndice I”, en Aristóteles, Física, I-II, Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.

Bywater, J. (Ed). (1894). Aristotle’s Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Coleman, J. (2000). A History of Political Thought (From the Middle Ages to the Renaissance), USA: Blackwell.

Eggers Lan, C. (Trad., Introd. y notas). (1967). Platón, Fedón. Córdoba, Arg.: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

Ferreiro, J. (en prensa). “Alcance y límites del influjo de la Política de Aristóteles en la teoría política medieval” en El arco y la lira, Nº 6.

Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. UK: Oxford University Press.

Kamp, A. (1993). La teoria politica di Aristotele. Presupposti e temi principali, Napoli: Valentino Editore.

Kerferd, G. H. (1981). “The nómos-physis controversy” en The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keyt, D. (1996). “Fred Miller on Aristotle´s Political Naturalism” en Ancient Philosophy, XVI; (1991). “Three Basic Theorems in Aristotle´s Politics”, A Companion to Aristotle´s Politics. USA: Blackwell.

Kullmann, W. (1991). “Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle”, en A Companion to Aristotle´s Politics. USA, Blackwell; (1993) “L’ image de l’ homme dans la pensée politique d’ Aristote” en Aubenque, P. (Ed.). Aristote Politique, Etudes sur la Politique d´Aristote. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Livov, G. (Trad., intro. y notas). (2015). Aristóteles, Política. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Quilmes-Prometeo; (2007). “Aristóteles Unitario. Impugnación metafísica y política del federalismo” en Deus Mortalis, N° 6; (2004), “Eunomía. Ley y legitimidad en la filosofía política de Aristóteles” en Deus Mortalis, N° 3.

Lloyd, G. (1993). “L´idée de nature dans la Politique D´Aristote”, en Aubenque, P (Ed.) Aristote Politique, Etudes sur la Politique d´Aristote. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Miller, F. (1995). Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle´s Politics, UK: Clarendon Press; (1991). “Aristotle on Natural Law and Justice”, A Companion to Aristotle´s Politics, USA: Blackwell.

Nederman, C. (1996). “The Meaning of Aristotelianism in Medieval Moral and Political Thought” en Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 57, N° 4; (1988). “Nature, Sin and the Origins of Society: The Ciceronian Tradition in the Medieval Political Thought” en Journal of the History of Ideas, XLIX.

Riedel, M. (1976). Metafísica y Metapolítica, Estudios sobre Aristóteles y el lenguaje político de la filosofía moderna, vol. I. Buenos Aires: Alfa.

Ritter, J. (1983). Metafisica e Politica, Studi su Aristotele e Hegel, Genova: Marietti, N° 40.

Schütrumpf, E. (1991). “Man as a Political Animal in Aristotle”, A Companion to Aristotle´s Politics. USA: Blackwell; (1981). “Kritische Überlegungen zur Ontologie und Terminologie der aristotelischen Politik” en Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 6/2 [1978], citado en Kullmann, W

Ullmann, W. (1985). Principios de gobierno y política en la Edad Media. España: Alianza.

Yack, B. (1993). The Problems of a Political Animal, Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thougth, USA: University of California Press.

Zingano, M. (2013). Natural, ethical, and political justice, The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Deslauriers M. & Destrée, P. (eds). Cambridge: C.U.P.

The authors of the articles published in the Digital Legal Magazine UANDES agree on the terms of publication, distribution, preservation, and content use contemplated in the licence:
Licencia Creative Commons

This work is under a license of Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.