Abstract
The present commentary exposes a critical vision of the sentence dictated by the Chilean Constitutional Court on the occasion of the requirements referred to the bill “aborto tres causales”. For this, after succinctly explaining the content of the requirements and the main argumentative line developed by the Court to deny the status of person to the nasciturus, the considerations exposed to motivate that decision are critically evaluated. Special emphasis is given to their disagreement with the new understanding of the personality that has developed in Civil law, based on the values involved in human rights.References
Alpa, G. (2017). ¿Qué es el derecho privado? Lima: Editorial Zela.
Corral, H. (2010). “La existencia legal de toda persona principia al nacer: una nueva lectura para una vieja norma. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad de Valparaíso, 311-326. Recuperado de: https://corraltalciani.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/existencialegal.pdf (Fecha de consulta 4 de junio de 2018).
MacCormick, N. (2007). Instituciones del derecho. Barcelona: Editorial Marcial Pons.
Peña, C. (1996). El derecho civil en su relación con el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. En Medina y Figueroa (Eds.). Sistema Jurídico y Derechos Humanos (pp. 545-659). Santiago, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.
Sierra, L. (2017). El nasciturus como persona: lectura incompleta, doctrina distorsionada. Puntos de Referencia. Centro de Estudios Públicos, (462), 1-12. Recuperado de: https://www.cepchile.cl/cep/site/artic/20170726/asocfile/20170726162938/pder462_lsierra.pdf (Fecha de consulta 4 de junio de 2018).
The authors of the articles published in the Digital Legal Magazine UANDES agree on the terms of publication, distribution, preservation, and content use contemplated in the licence:
This work is under a license of Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.