Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the irruption of the fourth industrial revolution (4.0.) and its consequences, especially Artificial Intelligence, in Justice, particularly in Criminal Justice. The incorporation of expert systems, algorithms and computational models in counseling is now a reality, as well as in predicting and in legal decisions. The incorporation of judicial robotic or robot-judge (machine learning) represents a disturbing situation. The replacement of the human-judge creates an artificial cognition that raises doubts about ethics, reliability, the individualization of the sanction, the possible responsibility of the machine, the sensitivity of especially vulnerable victims or depressed groups, the violation of the people’s rights, etc.References
Barona Vilar, S. (2011). Mediación penal: Fundamento, fines y régimen jurídico. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Barona Vilar, S. (2017). Proceso penal desde la Historia: Desde sus orígenes a la sociedad del miedo. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Barona Vilar, S. (2018). Justicia Penal: Globalización y Digitalización. Santiago, Chile: Thomson Reuters.
Braithwaite, J. (2003). Principles of Restorative Justice. En J. Roberts, A. Von Hirsch, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach & M. Schiff (Eds.). Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 1-20). Portland: Hart Publishing.
Chappell, A. T., Monk-Turner, E. & Payne, B. K. (2011). Broken Windows or Window Breakers: The Influence of Physical and Social Disorder on Quality of Life. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 522-540.
Christie, N. (1993). La industria del control del delito (¿La nueva forma del holocausto?). Buenos Aires: Del Puerto.
Cullen, F.T. & Gilbert, K. E. (1989). Reaffirming Rehabilitation. Cincinatti: Anderson Publ.
Guzmán Fluja, V. (2017). Sobre la aplicación de la inteligencia artificial a la solución de conflictos. En S. Barona Vilar (Ed.). Justicia civil y penal en la era global (67-122). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Hobsbawm, E.J., (2012), Guerra y paz en el Siglo XXI. Barcelona: Booket
Plant, R. (2016). Friedrich August von Hayek: Der (neo-)liberale Staat und das Ideal des Rechtsstaats. En Th. Biebricher (Ed.). Staatsverständnisse (75-98) Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Reitz, K. R. & Reitz, C. R. (1997). American Bar Association Adopts New Sentencing Standards. En M. Tonry & K. Hatlestad (Eds.). Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times: A Comparative Perspective (17-19) New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rich, W.D., Sutton, L.P., Clear, T.R. & Saks, M. (1982). Sentencing by Mathematics: An Evaluation of the Early Attempts to Develop and Implement Sentencing Guidelines. National Center for State Courts.
Rose, W. (2002). Crimes of Color: Risk, Profiling and the Contemporary Racialization of Social Control. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 16 (2), 179-205.
Russell, S. & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach file:///C:/Users/74740413/Downloads/a154ffbcec538a4161a406abf62f5b76-original.pdf [Fecha de consulta 24 de abril de 2019].
Schwab, K. (2018). La cuarta Revolución Industrial (4ª ed.). Barcelona: Debate.
Simester, D. I. & Brodie, R. J. (1993). Forecasting criminal sentencing decisions. International Journal of Forecasting 9(1), 49-60.
Stegler, M. B. (2003). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sucasas, A. L. (2018). La inteligencia artificial no va a ser más inteligente que nosotros. Revista Retina, El País, (2). Recuperado de https://retina.elpais.com/retina/2018/02/19/tendencias/1519034268_083764.html [Fecha de consulta 24 de abril de 2019].
Tonry, M. H. (1996), Sentencing Matters. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitman, J. Q. (2008). The Origins of Reasonable Doubts. Yale: Yale University Press.
Zysman Quirós, D. (2012). Sociología del castigo: Genealogía de la determinación de la pena. Buenos Aires: Didot.
The authors of the articles published in the Digital Legal Magazine UANDES agree on the terms of publication, distribution, preservation, and content use contemplated in the licence:
This work is under a license of Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.