Abstract
This paper analyzes the judicial recognition of the social function as a limit to the right of property, with reference to the judgment delivered by the Court of Appeals of Rancagua on June 4, 2024, in Civil Case No. 574-2023. In that decision, the court upheld the ruling of the court of first instance and rejected the claim filed against Exempt Resolution No. 523 of 2019, issued by the Regional Ministerial Secretariat (SEREMI) of National Assets of the O'Higgins Region, which complemented Exempt Resolution No. 5 of 1984, thereby authorizing vehicular access -and not only pedestrian access- to the beach adjacent to the claimant’s property.
References
Corvalán, J. L. (2016). Delimitación del derecho de propiedad. Editorial Librotecnia.
Obando, I. (2019). La función social de la propiedad: un análisis de sus antecedentes doctrinales, históricos y jurisprudenciales. En R. Fuentes y V. Opazo (Coord.), El derecho de propiedad: estudios públicos y privados (pp. 435-468). Tirant Lo Blanch.
Real Academia Española. (s.f.). Inmanente. En Diccionario de la Lengua Española. https://dle.rae.es/inmanente
Torrealba, E. (2023). Función social y ambiental en la legislación chilena. Editorial Metropolitana.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Jurídica Digital UANDES