Resumo
This article aims to explore the possibilities that exist for preserving natural spaces and their biodiversity in areas that are particularly complex due to population density, intensive monoculture agriculture, tourist pressure, or the high rate of forest fires exacerbated by the consequences of climate change, based on the design and implementation of a specific protection project in north-western Spain. It also transcends the usual coercive elements such as legislation, anticipating that political actors may not want to activate existing protection tools. Its methodology is based on the study of a successful case, public policy analysis techniques such as mapping key actors and interests, qualitative interviews, the study of the political, economic and social context, as well as the most relevant bibliography on the subject. The results show a field experience with a direct impact on land preservation and diversity in 16 hectares of ‘frondosas’ (broadleaf forest in the Atlantic forest), demonstrating that the legal or economic context is an ambivalent variable that can be used in favour of preservation. Thus, the conclusions align around the factor of feasibility, showing that elements of resistance such as economic performance, lax legislation, or the complexity of negotiating with highly diverse actors do not mean that preservation by local communities themselves is not possible.
Referências
Bazerman, M. & Neale, M. (1993). La negociación racional en un mundo irracional [Rational negotiation in an irrational world]. Paidós Empresa.
Beierle, T. C. (2002). The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions. Risk Analysis, 22, 739-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00065
Carroll, A. B. & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts. Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Ceausu, S., Hofmann, M., Navarro, L. M., Carver, S., Verburg, P. H., & Pereira, H. M. (2015). Mapping opportunities and challenges for rewilding in Europe. Conservation Biology, 29(4), 1017-1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12533
Chazdon, R. L. (2008). Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 320(5882), 1458-1460. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365
Colomer de Selva, M. (2020). El arte de negociar. Una lección de técnicas de negociación diplomática en tiempos de Felipe II [The Art of Negotiation. A Lesson in the Diplomatic Negotiation Techniques during the Reign of Felipe II]. Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración, 7(2), 63-74. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/cgap.70662
Copena, D. (2018). Montes Veciñais en Man Común e Baldios: Unha análise comparativa das propiedades comunitarias de Galicia e Portugal [Communal Forests and Baldios: A comparative analysis of community properties in Galicia and Portugal]. Sémata: Ciencias Sociais e Humanidades, 30, 85-104. https://doi.org/10.15304/s.30.5379
Dye, T. R. (2008). Understanding public policy (12th ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
European Commission. (2011). Communication Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0244
European Commission. (2020). Communication EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0380
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
Fernández Leiceaga, X. M. (1996). O monte veciñal en man común: historia e economía [The communal forest: history and economy]. Edicións do Castro.
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (3rd ed.). Penguin.
Foreman, D. (2004). Rewilding North America: A Vision for Conservation in the 21st Century. Island Press.
Galetti, M., Pires, A. S., Brancalion, P. H. S., & Fernández, F. A. S. (2017). Reversing defaunation by trophic rewilding in empty forests. Biotropica, 49(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12407)
García-Ruíz, J. M., Lasanta, T., Nadal-Romero, E., Lana-Renault, N., & Álvarez-Farizo, B. (2020). Rewilding and restoring cultural landscapes in Mediterranean mountains: Opportunities and challenges. Land Use Policy, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104850
Goetz, S. J., Baccini, A., Laporte, N. T., Johns, T., Walker, W., Kellndorfer, J., Houghton, R. A., & Sun, M. (2015). Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations: a comparison of methods. Carbon Balance and Management, 4(2).
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
Haller, A., & Bender, O., (2018). Among rewilding mountains: grassland conservation and abandoned settlements in the Northern Apennines. Landscape Research, 43(8), 1068-1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1495183
Loidi, J., Fernández-González, F., & Campos, J. A. (2010). A phytosociological survey of the temperate deciduous forests of the Atlantic biogeographic region of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Biosystems.
Lorimer, J., Sandom C., Jepson P., Doughty, C., Barua, M., & Kirby, K. (2015). Rewilding: Science, Practice, and Politics. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 39-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021406
Lowi T. J. (1972). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 24(4), 677-715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010188
Matikainen, O. A. (2019). Sustaining the One-dimensional: an Ideology Critique of Agenda 2030 and the SDGs. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1326645/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Meny, I. & Thoening, J. C. (1992). Las políticas públicas [Public Policies]. Ariel.
Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge of the Government of Spain (MITERD). (2020). Herramienta de cálculo de absorciones de CO2 por sumideros forestales [Tool for calculating CO2 absorption by forest sinks].

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Jurídica Digital UANDES

